The Mechanism of Polisuplain Control of Agrarian-Territorial Systems

Abstract

Introduction. Managing complex systems requires deep methodological research into all phases of system development, the relationships between its elements, and emerging contradictions, especially considering its multi-stakeholder nature. There is a need to study multi-stakeholder management of complex natural-social-economic objects—agrarian-territorial systems (ATS)—with the identification of their key subsystems: agricultural natural, agricultural production, agricultural economic, and social.
Aim. To examine ATS, on the one hand, as a unified natural-social-economic object within administratively defined boundaries and, on the other hand, through a systemic perception of its key subsystems, considering their emergent, goal-oriented, and functionally diverse nature, as well as the need to ensure their interconnected, consistent, and purposeful development.
Materials and methods. The study was based on systemic methodology in its structural-logical embodiment through the lens of the systemic sequence "goal-functions-structure-behavior-result." The construction of the management mechanism is grounded in research by scholars, including theoretical, analytical, and applied work on ATS and its subsystems, as well as systemic management.
Results. A general scheme of a multi-stakeholder management mechanism for the system and its components has been developed, aligning with the specified systemic sequence. To ensure informational, analytical, and coordination support for management entities within rural territories, the mechanism includes an evaluation block, multiplier, and communication integrator, with justification for their roles, places, and functions.
Conclusions. The proposed methodological approach and corresponding systemic tools can serve as a basis for the practical implementation of systemic methodology in managing ATS at any level—federal, regional, municipal, or settlement.

To cite: Baidakov A.N., Zvyagintseva O.S., The Mechanism of Polisuplain Control of Agrarian-Territorial Systems. Research in Economic and Financial Problems. 2025;3:5. https://doi.org/10.31279/2782-6414-2025-3-5